The Ideas Letter
Quinn Slobodian, whose new book—Hayek’s Bastards: Race, Gold, IQ, and the Capitalism of the Far Right—is being debated far and wide, has penned for The Ideas Letter a magisterial romp through metaphor. The natural sciences loom large in the neoliberalism conception, and Slobodian walks us through its myriad permutations, concluding with metaphor’s corrosion at the hands of Silicon Valley’s reactionary accumulation regime.
Minna Salami follows with a twist on the populism debate as it pertains to Africa. Salami deploys Nietzsche to wade through the thicket of power relations in the human mind and how this relates to fundamental questions around decoloniality. Her conclusions may rankle, but they demand a response.
Leif Weatherby then poses uncustomary questions about the AI condition. For Weatherby, we should be laser-focused on controlling data in the face of digital bureaucracy. Instead, we are seduced by the sci-fi dimensions of AI reasoning and thus blind to the main event. He reframes the debate accordingly.
Our curated section commences with the Zambian economist Grieve Chelwa and his effort to reanimate a weather-beaten developmentalist debate. For Chelwa, the concept of emancipation can’t be overlooked; it must be grappled with, as it is intrinsic to any conception of progress. His frame is orthogonal to Salami’s.
Then for our curated content, Jacob Dreyer, in American Affairs, deploys the great Chinese intellectual Wang Hui to make sense of the dialectical dynamic around nationalism and capitalism—as well as Dreyer’s own sustained concern:the dialectical relationship between China and the U.S.
This Ideas Letter concludes with a podcast on empathy—indeed, the war on empathy as it has emerged from the precincts of the tech,
Featured Essays
What is The Ideas Letter
Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.
We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.
You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!