The Ideas Letter
Feliz Año Nuevo. There is a lot to tackle in this issue so let’s jump straight into it. We lead with two very sharp essays that will ruffle some feathers and raise a few eyebrows. Productive dissent, considered critique—this is our daily bread. We hope you engage with these texts in that frame of mind.
First off is a piece by former BBC journalist and long-time Ukraine observer Leonid Ragozin that spotlights the lesser-appreciated story of the country’s democratic regression. Ragozin draws uncomfortable conclusions that merit attention and debate. We follow with the fine sociologist and author Gary Younge and his tough-minded critique of a celebrated new book from his fellow sociologist Musa al-Gharbi. Younge worries that al-Gharbi is drawing sociological conclusions without accounting for society and allows his master concepts—wokeism, in the first instance—to go undefined.
For our curated selection we lead with Wolfgang Streeck’s trenchant piece on the troubling politics of German anti antisemitism. Few people had on their bingo card that Deutschland would be the geography where combating antisemitism (and shielding Israel) would morph into a professional religion. A conversation between Adam Tooze and Ding Xiongfei, originally published in the Shanghai Review of Books, follows. Per usual with Tooze, the sky’s the limit, but here especially is a dissection of his political economy, his polemics with Perry Anderson, and the climate condition as refracted through a Toozian (and Chinese) lens.
If you have a spare two-and-a-half hours, a recent conversation in The Dig between Wendy Brown and Quinn Slobodian merits a close listen. The venerated political theorist and critic of neoliberalism and the historian of neoliberalism have a go at those themes and more. Taped after Donald Trump’s triumph last November,
What is The Ideas Letter
Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.
We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.
You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!