The Ideas Letter
Evgeny Morozov reads a lot more than you and I do. He has spent the last few years sequestered in an untouristed patch of the European continent hoovering up theory, penning a magnum opus (in which technology meets capitalism meets ideology), and learning a dozen languages. Soon enough (in summer ‘26, I believe) FSG will unleash the book on the world. Should that prospect excite, and I anticipate it will, note that Morozov’s spiky essay for The Ideas Letter this week defines a new class, the “oligarch-intellectual”—and is an early warning sign of things to come.
I asked David Runciman, our other commissioned author, to make intellectual sense of his professional pivot. After a quarter century as a Cambridge don, Runciman tossed away his chair in politics and joined the more modish world of fulltime podcasting. Runciman explains what his transition says about the novel forms by which information is transmitted and received.
Our curated content begins with a stunning essay from the law professor Julie E. Cohen, which follows, in a way, from Morozov’s commissioned contribution. Cohen takes aim at the class of tech oligarchs and traces the origins of their power. You’ll notice her play, of course, on the classic Robert Nozick text. We follow with a fascinating story of Keynesian thinking à la polonaise: Małgorzata Mazurek, a historian at Columbia, discusses, in a taped lecture, two progressive interwar Polish economists and their unlikely intellectual journey.
Next up is an Aeon profile of the South Korean Heideggerian thinker Byung-Chul Han. In his critique of digital capitalism, the psychoanalyst Josh Cohen provides a broad assessment of both Han’s philosophical contributions and his limitations.
Last is a podcast that spotlights what’s next for the Kurds of Syria after Assad’s demise,
Featured Essays
What is The Ideas Letter
Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.
We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.
You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!