The Ideas Letter

#54

In their visions of the future, socialists must begin accounting for artificial intelligence. So far, according to Evgeny Morozov, they’ve relied on old chestnuts rather than developing a strong theoretical basis for an AI-inflected socialism. Morozov argues that socialists should embrace the messy, “impure” nature of technology in order to shape a more humane future. This may just be the launching of a new theoretical program.

Regarding research programs, the historical sociologist Dylan Riley doesn’t consider Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism to be a useful intellectual guide to understanding today’s global malaise. Might Antonio Gramsci offer greater purchase on the state of play? Riley’s ultimate answer is to look squarely at politics, and to understand the damaged connections between the public and private spheres.

Matthew Shipp is perhaps the world’s premier avant garde jazz pianist whose personal language fuses innumerable influences yet remains unmistakably his own. In my interview with him, Shipp takes up questions of creative influence and personal sound, reflecting on the limits of language, the ineffable nature of originality, and how true greatness requires deep unlearning.

Our curated section kicks off with a lacerating review from Oliver Eagleton of Shadi Hamid’s grasping defense of American power in The Baffler. Stand guard all of you who purport to defend democracy à l’américaine!

We follow with Ida Danewid’s reinterpretation of the politics of James Baldwin, from a liberal champion of rights and equality to a more radical participant in global struggles. Does she succeed in her efforts to “undomesticate” Baldwin?

Last, my longstanding comrade-colleague, Darius Cuplinskas, interviews the naturalist Robert MacFarlane for the New Books Network.

Continue Reading → #54 Anxieties of Influence
#54

December 11, 2025

Anxieties of Influence

Featured Essays

What is The Ideas Letter

Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.

We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.

You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!

Anthology 2023–2025

Download our Anthology, a selection of essays from our first fifty issues, a smorgasbord of intellectual query.